How fatalistic should we be on AI?
© The Financial Times Limited 2024. All Rights Reserved. Not to be redistributed, copied or modified in any way. A long line of prestigious speakers, ranging from Sir Winston Churchill to Dame Iris Murdoch, has delivered the annual Romanes lecture at the University of Oxford, starting with William Gladstone in 1892. But rarely, if ever, […]
© The Financial Times Limited 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Not to be redistributed, copied or modified in any way.
A long line of prestigious speakers, ranging from Sir Winston Churchill to Dame Iris Murdoch, has delivered the annual Romanes lecture at the University of Oxford, starting with William Gladstone in 1892.
But rarely, if ever, can a lecturer have made such an arresting comment as Geoffrey Hinton did last month. The leading artificial intelligence researcher’s speech, provocatively entitled Will Digital Intelligence Replace Biological Intelligence?, concluded: almost certainly, yes. But Hinton rejected the idea, common in some West Coast tech circles, that humanism is somehow “racist” in continuing to assert the primacy of our own species over electronic forms of intelligence. “We humans should make our best efforts to stay around,” he joked.
Already have an active account? Log in here. Digital Edition
Digital edition access
P 125 per month (No free trial for this plan)
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
Basic
Continue reading with one of these options:
(billed annually at P 1,250)
(billed annually at P 960)
This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse the website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Read More.