On the Supreme Court, Disagreeing Without Being Disagreeable

U.S.|Sotomayor and Barrett, Lately at Odds, Discuss Relations at the Supreme Court https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/12/us/sotomayor-barrett-supreme-court.html You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load. A conversation on civics and civility included discussion of whether the court is more like a really […]

On the Supreme Court, Disagreeing Without Being Disagreeable

On the Supreme Court, Disagreeing Without Being Disagreeable thumbnail

U.S.|Sotomayor and Barrett, Lately at Odds, Discuss Relations at the Supreme Court

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/12/us/sotomayor-barrett-supreme-court.html

You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

A conversation on civics and civility included discussion of whether the court is more like a really good preschool or an arranged marriage with no possibility of divorce.

The nine Supreme Court justices, in black robes, smiling as they prepare to have their photos taken against a red backdrop. Five are sitting and four are standing.
Justices speak in order of seniority at their conferences, interruptions are not allowed and nobody speaks twice until everyone has spoken once.Credit…Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Adam Liptak

A week after Justice Amy Coney Barrett chastised Justice Sonia Sotomayor for choosing “to amplify disagreement with stridency” in a Supreme Court decision on former President Donald J. Trump’s eligibility to hold office, the two women appeared together on Tuesday to discuss civics and civility.

They gave, for the most part, a familiar account of a collegial court whose members know how to disagree without being disagreeable.

“We don’t speak in a hot way at our conferences,” Justice Barrett said, referring to the private meetings at which the justices discuss cases. “We don’t raise our voices no matter how hot-button the case is.”

Justice Sotomayor, who usually gives a sunny description of relations between the justices, registered a partial dissent.

“Occasionally someone might come close to something that could be viewed as hurtful,” Justice Sotomayor said. When that happens, she said, a senior colleague will sometimes call the offending justice, suggesting an apology or other way of patching things up.

Similar interactions can happen if a draft opinion is too sharp, she said. “There is dialogue around that, an attempt to find a different expression,” she said.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.