FAA Investigates Claims by Boeing Whistle-Blower About Flaws in 787 Dreamliner

Politics|F.A.A. Investigates Claims by Boeing Whistle-Blower About Flaws in 787 Dreamliner https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/09/us/politics/boeing-787-dreamliner-whistle-blower.html U.S. World Business Arts Lifestyle Opinion Audio Games Cooking Wirecutter The Athletic You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load. The whistle-blower, an engineer, says that […]

FAA Investigates Claims by Boeing Whistle-Blower About Flaws in 787 Dreamliner

FAA Investigates Claims by Boeing Whistle-Blower About Flaws in 787 Dreamliner thumbnail

Politics|F.A.A. Investigates Claims by Boeing Whistle-Blower About Flaws in 787 Dreamliner

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/09/us/politics/boeing-787-dreamliner-whistle-blower.html

You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

The whistle-blower, an engineer, says that sections of the plane’s body are being assembled in a way that could weaken the aircraft over time. Boeing says there is no safety issue.

A wide frame of inside a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. An employee is seen in the background wheeling a metal cart and is wearing a reflective construction vest.
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a twin-aisle jet that is more fuel efficient than many other aircraft used for long trips, in part because of its lightweight composite construction.Credit…Pool photo by Reuters

Mark WalkerJames Glanz

The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating claims made by a Boeing engineer who says that sections of the fuselage of the 787 Dreamliner are improperly fastened together and could break apart mid-flight after thousands of trips.

The engineer, Sam Salehpour, who worked on the plane, detailed his allegations in interviews with The New York Times and in documents sent to the F.A.A. A spokesman for the agency confirmed that it was investigating the allegations but declined to comment on them.

Mr. Salehpour, whose résumé says he has worked at Boeing for more than a decade, said the problems with fastening the sections came about as a result of changes in how the enormous sections were fitted and fastened together in the manufacturing assembly line. The fuselages for the plane come in several pieces, all from different manufacturers, and they are not exactly the same shape where they fit together, he said.

Boeing concedes those manufacturing changes were made, but a spokesman for the company, Paul Lewis, said there was “no impact on durability or safe longevity of the airframe.”

Mr. Lewis said Boeing had done extensive testing on the Dreamliner and “determined that this is not an immediate safety of flight issue.”

“Our engineers are completing complex analysis to determine if there may be a long-term fatigue concern for the fleet in any area of the airplane,” Mr. Lewis said. “This would not become an issue for the in-service fleet for many years to come, if ever, and we are not rushing the team so that we can ensure that analysis is comprehensive.”


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.