In Louisiana, natural gas terminals have destroyed communities. Trump wants to build more
For James Hiatt, founder of the environmental justice organization For a Better Bayou, the effects of liquefied natural gas have been obvious for years. In southern Louisiana where he lives, LNG terminals—which chill natural gas to its liquid state, so it can be shipped around the world—spew out toxic emissions like carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and methane. Their smells tinge the air, causing headaches the closer people are to the source, along with serious health issues like heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Terminal construction also threatens the physical environment, paving over local wetlands, polluting waterways, and increasing road traffic. Then there’s the economic impact. Though proponents of LNG have said these terminals bring jobs and economic growth, others contest those benefits. For one, LNG terminals get millions in property tax exemptions—in Cameron Parish, that’s amounted to an average of $700 million a year in forgone property taxes from 2011 to 2016 alone. “If LNG brings economic prosperity, I invite you to come visit Cameron and see what economic prosperity looks like here,” Hiatt says he told his local representatives who support such terminals. Houses there are still destroyed from previous hurricanes, and pollution and water shortages disrupt daily life. “The streets should be paved with gold at this point for the amount of money these companies have extracted from this place.” And if Donald Trump is elected in November, that industry—and all those effects—are set to expand even more. Trump’s first term expanded LNG Trump’s first term in office had disastrous climate effects. From 2017 to 2021, his administration rolled back more than 100 environmental rules—including safety rules for the trail transport of LNG, which is highly flammable. He also expanded LNG in a few ways, streamlining the permitting process and extending the terms of LNG export authorizations, allowing them to go through to 2050 (previously, the terms lasted 20 years). “During this administration, U.S. LNG exports have more than quadrupled, putting the United States among the top three LNG exporters in the world,” then-Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette said in an October 2020 release. Trump approved more than 20 new long-term LNG exports to other countries. From January 2017 to January 2021, LNG exports increased fivefold. “In the Trump administration, we saw an unfettered build out of LNG exports and rubber stamping of permits to keep building more gas exports to ship more gas overseas, at a time when we know we have to do everything we can to avert the worst impacts of the climate crisis and put more investments in clean and renewable energy,” says Mahyar Sorour, director of Beyond Fossil Fuels Policy at Sierra Club. Liquefied natural gas has been a part of the energy sector for decades, but for years the U.S. primarily imported LNG from other countries. The U.S. only began exporting LNG in 2016, when the Sabine Pass export terminal was built in Cameron Parish, Louisiana (the first LNG export terminal built in the lower 48 states). [Image: United States Department of Energy] Since then, the U.S. has become the largest natural gas exporter in the world, sending it primarily to Europe and Asia. There are now eight LNG export facilities in the U.S., mostly along the Gulf coast in Louisiana and Texas (plus seven under construction, and about 12 more approved terminals). Demand for LNG has ramped up in recent years, and is expected to keep growing, as countries look to move away from coal—and natural gas production has spiked because of the boom in fracking (LNG is fracked gas cooled to its liquid state). [Image: United States Department of Energy] A Second Trump Term means even more If Trump were to win this November, a second Trump term would mean more of the same. “I will approve the [LNG] export terminals on my very first day back,” he said at a rally earlier this year. On the campaign trail, Trump has already shared plans to increase LNG exports, primarily to China, and to cut regulations for the industry. Project 2025 details a plan to “ensure that LNG export applications are reviewed and approved expeditiously,” and suggests that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “should not use environmental issues like climate change as a reason to stop LNG projects.” In contrast, the Biden administration announced a pause on LNG terminal approvals, a landmark moment that—even as it faces issues in the courts—is seen as a step toward ending our dependence on fossil fuels. That pause was meant to allow the Department of Energy time to update its climate and economic analysis of such terminals. (Oil and gas production has still grown under Biden, even as the administration has focused on clean energy and made climate strides). “During the Trump administration, the economic and the environmental studies were woefully inadequate, which is why the [Biden]
Tomas Kauer - News Moderator 
For James Hiatt, founder of the environmental justice organization For a Better Bayou, the effects of liquefied natural gas have been obvious for years. In southern Louisiana where he lives, LNG terminals—which chill natural gas to its liquid state, so it can be shipped around the world—spew out toxic emissions like carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and methane. Their smells tinge the air, causing headaches the closer people are to the source, along with serious health issues like heart and respiratory diseases and cancer.
Terminal construction also threatens the physical environment, paving over local wetlands, polluting waterways, and increasing road traffic. Then there’s the economic impact. Though proponents of LNG have said these terminals bring jobs and economic growth, others contest those benefits. For one, LNG terminals get millions in property tax exemptions—in Cameron Parish, that’s amounted to an average of $700 million a year in forgone property taxes from 2011 to 2016 alone.
“If LNG brings economic prosperity, I invite you to come visit Cameron and see what economic prosperity looks like here,” Hiatt says he told his local representatives who support such terminals. Houses there are still destroyed from previous hurricanes, and pollution and water shortages disrupt daily life. “The streets should be paved with gold at this point for the amount of money these companies have extracted from this place.”
And if Donald Trump is elected in November, that industry—and all those effects—are set to expand even more.
Trump’s first term expanded LNG
Trump’s first term in office had disastrous climate effects. From 2017 to 2021, his administration rolled back more than 100 environmental rules—including safety rules for the trail transport of LNG, which is highly flammable. He also expanded LNG in a few ways, streamlining the permitting process and extending the terms of LNG export authorizations, allowing them to go through to 2050 (previously, the terms lasted 20 years).
“During this administration, U.S. LNG exports have more than quadrupled, putting the United States among the top three LNG exporters in the world,” then-Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette said in an October 2020 release. Trump approved more than 20 new long-term LNG exports to other countries. From January 2017 to January 2021, LNG exports increased fivefold.
“In the Trump administration, we saw an unfettered build out of LNG exports and rubber stamping of permits to keep building more gas exports to ship more gas overseas, at a time when we know we have to do everything we can to avert the worst impacts of the climate crisis and put more investments in clean and renewable energy,” says Mahyar Sorour, director of Beyond Fossil Fuels Policy at Sierra Club.
Liquefied natural gas has been a part of the energy sector for decades, but for years the U.S. primarily imported LNG from other countries. The U.S. only began exporting LNG in 2016, when the Sabine Pass export terminal was built in Cameron Parish, Louisiana (the first LNG export terminal built in the lower 48 states).
[Image: United States Department of Energy]
Since then, the U.S. has become the largest natural gas exporter in the world, sending it primarily to Europe and Asia. There are now eight LNG export facilities in the U.S., mostly along the Gulf coast in Louisiana and Texas (plus seven under construction, and about 12 more approved terminals). Demand for LNG has ramped up in recent years, and is expected to keep growing, as countries look to move away from coal—and natural gas production has spiked because of the boom in fracking (LNG is fracked gas cooled to its liquid state).
[Image: United States Department of Energy]
A Second Trump Term means even more
If Trump were to win this November, a second Trump term would mean more of the same. “I will approve the [LNG] export terminals on my very first day back,” he said at a rally earlier this year. On the campaign trail, Trump has already shared plans to increase LNG exports, primarily to China, and to cut regulations for the industry.
Project 2025 details a plan to “ensure that LNG export applications are reviewed and approved expeditiously,” and suggests that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “should not use environmental issues like climate change as a reason to stop LNG projects.”
In contrast, the Biden administration announced a pause on LNG terminal approvals, a landmark moment that—even as it faces issues in the courts—is seen as a step toward ending our dependence on fossil fuels. That pause was meant to allow the Department of Energy time to update its climate and economic analysis of such terminals. (Oil and gas production has still grown under Biden, even as the administration has focused on clean energy and made climate strides).
“During the Trump administration, the economic and the environmental studies were woefully inadequate, which is why the [Biden]
